The Law Offices of Jonathan Zendeh Del, PLLC


The Law Offices of Jonathan Zendeh Del, PLLC is a Galveston, Texas based law firm. We provide clients representation in criminal defense, family law, and personal injury cases.
*Principal Office in Galveston, TX*

409.740.1111
409.515.5007

Arrested?

Arrested? Contact the experienced criminal lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan Zendeh Del, PLLC

Family Matters?

Family Matters? Contact the experienced family lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan Zendeh Del, PLLC

Injured?

Injured? Contact the experienced personal injury lawyers at The Law Offices of Jonathan Zendeh Del, PLLC

Separate Convictions For Possession of Firearm and Possession of Ammunition = Double Jeopardy

Separate convictions and consecutive sentences for possession of firearm and possession of ammunition violated Double Jeopardy. United States v. Meza, 2012 WL 5458921 (5th Cir. 2012).

Galveston Texas Gun Lawyers
Galveston Texas Gun Lawyers

On July 14, 2009, three shotguns and a rifle were stolen from a pawn shop in Wichita Falls, Texas. Basedon information gathered during the investigation, the

police searched the property of defendant, a convicted felon, and found a Mossberg shotgun in a shed and two boxes of ammunition in the house.

The defendant was charged in a two-count indictment. Count 1 charged him

with being a felon in possession of a firearm and Count 2 charged him with being a felon in possession of ammunition. He pled guilty to Count 1, with Count 2 being dismissed, thus capping his maximum sentence at 120 months. The district court rejected the plea agreement and the defendant went to trial, where he was found guilty on both Counts. The district court imposed a sentence of 120 months for each count, to be served consecutively, for an aggregate of 240 months.

On appeal, the defendant argued that the separate sentences

for possession of a firearm and possession of ammunition violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. Reviewing for plain error, and citing United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915 (5th Cir. 1992) and United States v. Dunford, 148 F.3d 385 (4th Cir. 1998), the Fifth Circuit agreed with the defendant, finding no difference between the facts in Berry and the facts in the present case. “As in Berry, [the defendant] was convicted under §922(g)(1) for simultaneous possession of a firearm and ammunition, both of which were found during the single police search of his property. The indictment alleges that [the defendant] possessed both the firearm and ammunition that day (July 22, 2009).” “[A]bsent an indictment charging [the defendant] with possessing or receiving the firearms and ammunition on separate occasions, and proof and argument supporting the same, his dual convictions and sentences under §922(g)(1) cannot stand under Berry.”

The judgment was affirmed, but the sentence was vacated and remanded “for dismissal of one

of the counts of the indictment (at the government’s election), and order resentencing on the count selected by the government.”


Posted Mon, January 07, 2013 - 5:08:17