Can a Victim Drop Family Violence Charges in Texas?

A person arrested for family violence in Galveston, Texas may hear that the alleged victim wants the charges dropped and assume the criminal case will soon disappear. Texas law does not give the alleged victim that authority. Once police and prosecutors become involved, the State can continue pursuing the case even when the complainant no longer wants prosecution.

That distinction can be critical for a defendant. A prosecutor may consider the alleged victim’s wishes, but the decision may also depend on 911 recordings, police body-camera footage, photographs, witness statements, medical records, text messages, and other evidence. Anyone accused of assault-family violence should treat the case seriously until a court or prosecutor formally resolves it.

Awards & Media Appearances

Best Law Firms 2026

best lawyers- zendeh del & associates

best lawyers- jonathan zendeh del

Top

Avvo Client Champion

The Daily News Readers Choice Winner 2025

National Association of Distinguished Counsel

Super Lawyers

Super Lawyers

Avvo 10

Yelp

Best Law Firm in Galveston

2025 Platinum Martindale-Hubbell Client Champion

Houstonia

KHOU11

Galveston County The Daily News

CNN

Houston Chronical

The Alleged Victim Does Not “Press” or “Drop” Criminal ChargesAttorney meeting with a client about a Texas family violence case in a bright Galveston law office.

People often say that a spouse, dating partner, or family member “pressed charges.” That phrase can create a misleading impression about how Texas criminal cases work.

An alleged victim can report an incident, provide a statement, cooperate with police, or tell prosecutors that prosecution is not desired. The alleged victim does not personally control the criminal charge.

Texas law allows a peace officer to make a warrantless arrest when the officer has probable cause to believe that a person committed an offense involving family violence. Once an arrest and criminal prosecution occur, the State becomes responsible for deciding whether the case proceeds.

For that reason, someone searching can victim drop family violence charges Texas should understand that a request from the complainant may matter, but it does not automatically end the prosecution.

Who Decides Whether a Texas Family-Violence Case Continues?

The prosecutor handling the criminal case generally decides whether to continue prosecution, negotiate a resolution, reduce a charge, or seek dismissal.

Texas law specifically limits dismissal of family-violence criminal proceedings merely because related civil proceedings are pending or absent. The policy reflects the fact that these cases are treated as criminal matters involving the State rather than private disputes that the parties can simply cancel.

A complainant can tell the prosecutor that prosecution is not desired. Defense counsel can also present weaknesses in the State’s evidence and explain why dismissal may be appropriate.

The prosecutor still makes the decision for the State.

What Is an Affidavit of Non-Prosecution?

An affidavit of non-prosecution in Texas is generally a sworn written statement from the alleged victim expressing that the person does not want the criminal prosecution to continue.

Depending on the circumstances, an affidavit may address matters such as:

  • The complainant’s desire not to pursue the case
  • Clarification of statements previously made to police
  • The complainant’s recollection of the incident
  • Whether the complainant fears the defendant
  • Whether the parties want to resume contact
  • Facts that the complainant believes law enforcement misunderstood

The precise contents depend on the case.

An affidavit should never contain false information. Changing a truthful statement merely to help another person escape prosecution can create serious legal problems.

Does an Affidavit Require the Prosecutor to Dismiss?

No. An affidavit of non-prosecution does not require a Texas prosecutor to dismiss an assault-family-violence charge.

The prosecutor may review the affidavit along with everything else in the case. If there is little independent evidence and the complainant no longer supports the original allegation, the affidavit may become significant.

A prosecutor may take a different view when the case contains strong independent evidence, such as photographs, recordings, witnesses, or police observations.

This is why a defendant should not assume that signing an affidavit automatically means family violence charges will be dropped.

The Zendeh Del & Associates, PLLC Team

Jonathan Zendeh Del

Jonathan Zendeh Del

Trial Attorney

Gabe Perez

Gabe Perez

Trial Attorney

Carolyn Zendeh Del

Carolyn Zendeh Del

Certified Mediator, Attorney

Attorney Chase Waterwall

Chase Waterwall

Trial Attorney

Dorothy Porretto

Dorothy Porretto

Office Manager, Paralegal

Pedro Ruiz

Pedro Ruiz

Trial Attorney / Retired Judge

Legal Assistant Zaira Banda

Zaira Banda

Legal Assistant

Legal Assistant Colleen Herndon

Colleen Herndon

Legal Assistant

Why Prosecutors Sometimes Continue Without the Alleged Victim

Prosecutors know that relationships can change after an arrest. Couples may reconcile. Families may depend financially on one another. A complainant may become concerned about the consequences of a conviction.

Because of those circumstances, prosecutors may examine whether evidence exists apart from the complainant’s current wishes.

That approach can result in what is sometimes called an evidence-based prosecution. The State attempts to prove the charge through evidence collected at or near the time of the alleged incident instead of depending entirely on the complainant’s testimony.

Whether that approach succeeds depends on the evidence and the rules governing its admissibility.

911 Calls, Bodycam, Photographs and Other Evidence

A family-violence case may contain far more evidence than the original accusation.

Police and prosecutors may review:

  • 911 recordings made during or shortly after the alleged incident
  • Body-camera footage showing statements, injuries, demeanor, or the scene
  • Photographs of injuries or property damage
  • Medical records documenting reported injuries
  • Officer observations made during the investigation
  • Witness statements from neighbors, relatives, or other people
  • Text messages and electronic communications
  • Recorded telephone calls
  • Admissions allegedly made by the defendant

Not every piece of evidence is automatically admissible at trial. The defense can examine how evidence was obtained, whether statements are legally admissible, whether recordings provide proper context, and whether the evidence proves every required element.

An experienced assault family violence lawyer in Galveston can also investigate evidence that may contradict the initial accusation.

What Happens if the Alleged Victim Changes Their Story?

A complainant sometimes gives an account after the arrest that differs from what was originally reported.

That change does not automatically prove which version is correct.

Prosecutors may compare the new statement with 911 audio, body-camera footage, photographs, physical evidence, witness accounts, and prior statements. The defense may examine why the statements changed and whether the initial account was inaccurate, incomplete, emotional, misunderstood, or contradicted by objective evidence.

Inconsistencies can become particularly significant when the State has little independent evidence.

The key question remains whether prosecutors can prove the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Emergency Protective Orders and No-Contact Conditions

A family-violence arrest can create legal restrictions even when the alleged victim wants the defendant to return home.

A magistrate may issue an emergency protective order imposing restrictions involving contact, communication, proximity, or other conduct. Texas law provides specific authority for magistrates to issue emergency protection orders after certain arrests involving family violence.

Bond conditions can create separate restrictions.

The complainant cannot privately give the defendant permission to violate a court order. If an order prohibits communication or contact, the defendant must follow it unless the court modifies or removes the restriction.

This issue is particularly important for couples who want to reconcile or continue living together while the criminal case remains pending.

Why the Defendant Should Not Contact the Complainant About the Case

A defendant should never pressure the complainant to change a statement, sign an affidavit, refuse to testify, or stop cooperating with prosecutors.

Texas Penal Code Section 36.05 prohibits certain conduct intended to influence a witness, including offering benefits or coercing a witness to withhold testimony, avoid legal process, miss a proceeding, or discontinue or delay another person’s prosecution.

Even communication that the defendant considers harmless may create additional allegations if prosecutors interpret it as intimidation, pressure, or improper influence.

If communication is restricted by a bond condition or protective order, contact may also create a separate legal problem.

Case-related communication should generally be handled through counsel when restrictions or witness issues exist.

Case Results

$11,820,000

WARN ACT
SETTLEMENT

Reached a settlement of $11,820,000

$11,820,000

WARN ACT CASE
SETTLEMENT

Employees fired when not given proper notice

Not Guilty

DRUG JURY TRIAL

Client was a dentist caught with 12 grams of methamphetamine. 

Case Dismissed

DRAM SHOP CASE

Death of a person who was run over by a drunk person who left a party.

$2,500,000

CAR ACCIDENT

Confidential settlement of $2,500,000

$4,500,000

DRAM SHOP CASE

Death of a person who was run over by a drunk person who left a party

Not Guilty

DWI JURY TRIAL

Client was asleep on the side of the road with the car on. Breath was .248

Case Dismissed

STATE OF TEXAS v. C.S.

Wrecked motorcycle while leaving the beach, an officer witnessed the accident and assumed he was intoxicated

Common Defenses to Assault-Family Violence

Texas Penal Code Section 22.01 defines assault to include intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causing bodily injury, intentionally or knowingly threatening imminent bodily injury, and certain offensive or provocative physical contact. The statute specifically includes conduct involving a spouse.

The proper defense depends on the facts.

Possible defenses may include:

  • Self-defense: The defendant lawfully responded to another person’s use or attempted use of force.
  • Defense of another person: The defendant acted to protect someone else.
  • Accidental injury: The evidence does not establish the mental state required for the charged offense.
  • False accusation: Evidence contradicts or undermines the accusation.
  • Mistaken interpretation: Police misunderstood an argument, physical interaction, or surrounding circumstances.
  • Insufficient evidence: The State cannot prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Witness credibility issues: Material inconsistencies weaken the State’s account.
  • Evidentiary challenges: Certain statements, recordings, or other evidence may be subject to legal challenges.

A defense strategy should be based on the actual police reports, recordings, witness accounts, physical evidence, and circumstances of the case.

Consequences Beyond Jail: Firearms, Employment and Criminal Record

An assault-family-violence case can create consequences far beyond the immediate possibility of fines, probation, or incarceration.

Depending on the charge and outcome, issues may involve:

  • Firearm possession rights
  • Employment and professional licensing
  • Criminal background checks
  • Housing opportunities
  • Immigration consequences
  • Child custody or family-law proceedings
  • Future criminal cases
  • Eligibility for certain forms of record clearing

Texas assault law can also increase the seriousness of certain later charges when the accused has a qualifying prior family-violence conviction.

That makes the long-term effect of the case an important part of the defense analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my spouse drop the charges?

Your spouse can tell prosecutors that prosecution is not desired, but your spouse does not control the criminal case. The State decides whether the charge continues.

What is an affidavit of non-prosecution?

An affidavit of non-prosecution is generally a sworn statement in which the alleged victim explains that prosecution is not desired or provides information relevant to the accusation. Prosecutors may consider it, but the affidavit does not automatically require dismissal.

Can the State prosecute without the victim?

Yes. Depending on the evidence and admissibility rules, prosecutors may attempt to proceed using 911 recordings, police footage, photographs, witnesses, officer testimony, electronic communications, medical evidence, and other proof.

Can we live together while the case is pending?

Possibly, but only if no protective order, bond condition, or other court order prohibits the arrangement or related contact. A defendant should review every applicable restriction before returning to the residence.

Can a protective order be removed?

A court may have authority to modify certain restrictions, depending on the type of order and circumstances. The protected person cannot simply cancel a judicial order through a private agreement with the defendant.

What happens if the victim refuses to testify?

The case does not automatically disappear. Prosecutors may seek testimony through a subpoena and may evaluate whether other admissible evidence can prove the charge without the complainant’s cooperation.

Speak With a Galveston Assault-Family-Violence Attorney Today

If an alleged victim wants the charges dropped, do not assume that your Texas family-violence case is finished. Zendeh Del & Associates PLLC can review the allegations, police reports, recordings, witness issues, protective orders, bond conditions, and possible defenses in your Galveston case. Contact the firm today for a free consultation and learn what options may be available based on the evidence.

Client
Reviews

See what our past clients have to say about us.

5 Stars

These guys are amazing. They made a most horrific experience bearable. They treated me with respect and no judgment. I cannot describe how grateful I am for their representation with my case. 5 stars is not enough. I hope I never need them again but would ABSOLUTELY use them again and definitely recommend them.

— Jennifer S.

5 Stars

Jonathan Zendeh Del and Associates worked tirelessly on my case. They kept me informed every step of the way. In the end the got my case dismissed and I am so grateful that we out our trust in his law firm. I can honestly say the rumors were true. He really is the best.

— Kristin F.