Can Marijuana Users Legally Own Guns? The Supreme Court Is About to Decide

In a case that could reshape the intersection of gun rights and marijuana use, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether regular cannabis users can lawfully possess firearms — a ruling that may impact millions of Americans, including residents in Galveston and across Texas.

The case stems from the prosecution of Ali Danial Hemani, a Texas man charged with unlawful gun possession. Federal authorities allege Hemani admitted to being a regular marijuana user, which under current federal law bars him from owning a firearm. However, a federal appeals court struck down that law as unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s recent expansion of gun rights.

Now, the high court will weigh whether the ban on gun ownership for cannabis users holds up under the Constitution, particularly after its landmark 2022 ruling that reaffirmed the right to carry firearms in public for self-defense.

The Zendeh Del & Associates, PLLC Team

Jonathan Zendeh Del

Trial Attorney

Gabe Perez

Trial Attorney

Carolyn Zendeh Del

Certified Mediator, Attorney

Chase Waterwall

Trial Attorney

Dorothy Porretto

Office Manager, Paralegal

Pedro Ruiz

Judge

Legal Assistant Zaira Banda

Zaira Banda

Legal Assistant

Legal Assistant Colleen Herndon

Colleen Herndon

Legal Assistant

Why This Matters in Texas

Texas has long embraced gun rights, and with the state’s relaxed stance on medical marijuana — and a growing push for full legalization — the case has immediate implications for many residents. The current federal law doesn’t distinguish between occasional and habitual use, and it doesn’t exempt users in states that have legalized marijuana.

The Biden administration’s Justice Department argues that regular drug users pose a significant public safety threat and that restricting their access to firearms is justified. But Hemani’s legal team — and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals — contend that the law is overly broad and unconstitutional, especially since millions of Americans have used marijuana without ever committing a violent offense.

Awards & Media Appearances

What the Court’s Decision Could Mean

The outcome of this case could:

  • Determine whether a marijuana user with no history of violence or mental illness can legally own a gun.

  • Clarify how far the federal government can go in restricting gun ownership based on behavior not inherently criminal under state law.

  • Open the door to legal challenges involving other substances or behaviors deemed “risky” by the federal government.

With a growing number of states, including Texas, legalizing or decriminalizing marijuana, the Supreme Court’s decision could redefine Second Amendment protections in the context of evolving drug laws.

Client
Reviews

See what our past clients have to say about us.

These guys are amazing. They made a most horrific experience bearable. They treated me with respect and no judgment. I cannot describe how grateful I am for their representation with my case. 5 stars is not enough. I hope I never need them again but would ABSOLUTELY use them again and definitely recommend them.

— Jennifer S.

Jonathan Zendeh Del and Associates worked tirelessly on my case. They kept me informed every step of the way. In the end the got my case dismissed and I am so grateful that we out our trust in his law firm. I can honestly say the rumors were true. He really is the best.

— Kristin F.

Charged with Gun or Drug Crimes in Galveston?

Zendeh Del & Associates, PLLC monitors federal decisions like this one closely because they influence how cases are handled in Texas courts. If you’ve been charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, drug crime, or both — especially if marijuana use is involved — you need a defense strategy tailored to both state and federal legal standards.

Source: ABC13 – Supreme Court to Hear Case on Guns and Marijuana Use